scshunt wrote: > On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote: >>>> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises >>> ENDORSE AGORA >> >> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand >> for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F then A else P", I'm >> interpreting this as ineffective due to lack of clarity. >> > > Agora is a person. This is, I believe, an attempt to endorse Agora in > its capacity as a person, although Agora is not an eligible voter.
Rule 2339 is ineffective due to insufficient power.
