scshunt wrote: > Walker wrote: >> I initiate a criminal case accusing Yally of violating Rule 2157 >> (Judicial Panels) by failing to act to ensure that the judicial panel >> of scshunt, Yally and Pavitra satisfied its obligations with regards >> to CFJs 3028a and 3029a. > > Did the panel fail to satisfy its obligations? If not, surely this is > NOT GUILTY.
I'm not sure if it failed (because Murphy might have resolved the case after the time limit etc.) but Yally did nothing to help. The related rule says "SHALL act collectively" so I suppose it's not as simple a case as I thought. -- Charles Walker
