On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> At first I thought "putting on the revision number means it breaks if
> another proposal changes the revision number in the meantime" but then
> I thought "is it even possible to amend a specific revision number of
> a rule?" so maybe it breaks regardless.  Rulekeepor opinion?  -G.

"Amend Rule xxxx/yy" would make a convenient shorthand for "Amend Rule
xxxx, but only if its current revision number is yy". I suggest
interpreting it that way by default from now on.

—Machiavelli

Reply via email to