On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > At first I thought "putting on the revision number means it breaks if > another proposal changes the revision number in the meantime" but then > I thought "is it even possible to amend a specific revision number of > a rule?" so maybe it breaks regardless. Rulekeepor opinion? -G.
"Amend Rule xxxx/yy" would make a convenient shorthand for "Amend Rule xxxx, but only if its current revision number is yy". I suggest interpreting it that way by default from now on. —Machiavelli