On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:29 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Tanner Swett <swe...@mail.gvsu.edu> > > > wrote: > > >> I call a CFJ on the following statement: A person CAN violate Rule 101 > > >> by failing to treat Agora right good forever without violating any > > >> other regulation found in Rule 101. > > > > > > Evidence: CFJ 2515. > > > > I intend, with such-and-such support, to file a Motion to Reconsider > > CFJ 2515. Arguments: in my opinion, the requirement is too vague to be > > enforceable. > > If a non-Appeals judicial case (1) has a judgement that has been > in effect for less than seven days and not been appealed, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > [FWIW, I agree with you].
Aaaand you sent that to discussion, so you knew that. More coffee for me.
