On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Alex Smith wrote: > (Agora /should/ be > able to survive missing any single sentence from its ruleset, but > sometimes I'm not so sure…) A sort of scam-of-the-week contest, as it > were. Whoever chooses which sentence to disable would clearly have an > advantage, as they could think up the scams ahead of time.
Depends on your definition of "survive". One scam I tried once, when I was patching a rule "honestly", was to delete a single 'not' which would have given the first person who realized it supreme power (side note: I was the assessor at the time; scam was spotted). -G.
