Yeah, I'll add that to my arguments. The way I explained it, the goal wasn't to destroy BlogNomic or otherwise mess it up, but rather to play a Dynasty with Agora as Emperor. That's what I got from the invasion, and I thought it would have been a cool experiment. Being a player of both, I would have voted against anything geared towards making the Agoran Rule permanent, or anything that would make BlogNomic unplayable afterwards.
Since that's the feeling I got from the other "invaders" - a very Nomic-like "let's do this and see what happens" - I defended Agora on that basis. ~ Roujo On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Max Schutz wrote: >> hilariously enough i saw both of those things on reddit >> >> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Jonathan Rouillard >> <jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, and I had to defend Agora on that matter when OmNomNomic's >> Inquisitor started to question me on our "beligerent" attitude during >> that period. It was most pleasant. > > prob worth mentioning that Agora never officially sanctioned any > invasion (with proposals, or setting status to hostile). Some > folks who were players in both just came here to recruit some rabble > for invasion. > > So Agora was not officially involved, but could certainly be cited for > sheltering and serving as a training ground for insurgents. > > -G. > > >
