On 25 Jun 2013 21:52, "Fool" <fool1...@gmail.com> wrote: > 331 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 214 be amended to read: > > > > The Speaker shall choose Judges randomly from the set of qualified > > players. The players qualified to judge a statement are the Speaker > > and those Voters who voted on the rule change whose voting period most > > recently ended, except for the player who invoked judgement, and the > > player (if any) most recently selected as the statement's Judge. > > > > [Proposal comment: i.e. judges now selected from active players rather > > than always being the Speaker.
I vote AGAINST Prop. 331. > > 332 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 302 be amended to read: > > > > When a proposal is adopted, each Voter who voted against it shall > > receive 5 points, and its author shall receive 10 points. When a > > proposal's voting period ends, each Voter who voted on it shall > > receive 5 points, unless they received points by this clause in the > > last 24 hours. > > > > [Proposal comment: Reward for voting.] I vote FOR Prop. 332. > > 333 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 205 be amended to read: > > > > The Speaker shall make one proposal distribution per 24 hours, > > numbering and publishing the text of each proposal submitted since the > > last distribution. This starts each such proposal's prescribed voting > > period, which lasts 24 hours. > > > > [Proposal comment: Fewer distributions and overlapping voting periods > > = more votes?] I vote AGAINST Prop 333. It's blitz nomic ain't it? It's supposed to feel chaotic. > > > > 334 (omd): > > I propose that Rules 217 (game custom, spirit of the game) be made immutable. I vote AGAINST Prop 334. > > 335 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 213 (judgements) be made immutable. I vote AGAINST Prop 335. > > 336 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 210 (timing of rule changes) be made immutable. I vote AGAINST Prop 336. > > 337 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 102 (initial mutability) be made mutable (because > > I would like to repeal it). I vote FOR Prop 337. > > 338 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 111 (conflict between mutable and immutable rules) > > be made mutable (ditto, I would like to make numerical precedence > > apply to all conflicts). I vote FOR Prop 338. > > 339 (omd): > > I propose that Rule 109 be made mutable (because I would like to make > > rule numbers stable rather than changing after every amendment). I vote FOR Prop 339. > > 340 (Steve): > > Enact a new Rule which reads: > > > > Within 24 hours of this Rule being enacted, the Speaker shall publish > > the names and email addresses of all registered players of Agora XX. > I vote FOR Prop 340. Though I already did. > 341 (scshunt): > > I propose the following rule: > > > > At 12:00 July 1 2013 UTC+1200, Agora XX ends and the player with the > > most points wins the game. In the event of a tie, the tied player who > > most recently had more points than each other tied player wins. I vote AGAINST Prop 341. > >
