On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Tanner Swett <swe...@mail.gvsu.edu> wrote: > I intend, without 35 objections, to destroy one yak, under the condition that > I CANNOT resolve this intent successfully.
Gratuitous: By the precedent of CFJ 2879-80, this is not scammable. By more recent precedent, it is. I really need to reread the rules regularly.
