On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Tanner Swett <swe...@mail.gvsu.edu> wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > >>> The candidates for Promotor are omd and Machiavelli. > >> I ENDORSE the current Promotor. > > > > Perhaps it would be clearest to say "I ENDORSE the person who is Promotor > > as of the time this vote is cast"? It's not clear that the phrase "the > > current Promotor", when "evaluated ... at the end of the voting period", > > refers to the Promotor at the time the vote was cast. > > > > —Machiavelli > > > > Pretty sure it's evaluated at the end of the voting period, as is > intended. Ask omd, I believe he took advantage of that, once. Or was > is scshunt? =P
It's *evaluated* at the end of the voting period, but that could easily mean "at the end of the voting period, evaluate who was the 'current promotor' at the time the vote was cast". I would personally read it that way. -G.