>The panel (and future judges) should consider that the defendant recently made >emself inactive, rendering TIME OUT most likely ineffectual.
E was not inactive at the time of the original sentencing, though. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 Jul 2013 08:39, "James Beirne" <james.m.bei...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> What follows is not really a direct reply but is an explanation, of >> sorts, for my feelings towards the sentence, particularly as to why I >> feel a time out is appropriate. > > The panel (and future judges) should consider that the defendant recently > made emself inactive, rendering TIME OUT most likely ineffectual.