>The panel (and future judges) should consider that the defendant recently made 
>emself inactive, rendering TIME OUT most likely ineffectual.

E was not inactive at the time of the original sentencing, though.

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Charles Walker
<charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2013 08:39, "James Beirne" <james.m.bei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What follows is not really a direct reply but is an explanation, of
>> sorts, for my feelings towards the sentence, particularly as to why I
>> feel a time out is appropriate.
>
> The panel (and future judges) should consider that the defendant recently
> made emself inactive, rendering TIME OUT most likely ineffectual.

Reply via email to