On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:45 -0400, Fool wrote: >> I submit the following proposal: >> >> ======= >> Agora pulls a B (AI=3.1, PF=0, disi.) >> >> In rule 1551 (Ratification, Power=3.1), replace the sentence: >> >> Ratifying a public document is secured. >> >> with: >> >> Ratifying a public document is secured with Power threshold 3. >> >> [ Question for Platonists: When was the last time anything actually >> ratified? ] > > This badly needs fixing in both the scam-succeeded and scam-failed > gamestates, for us to have much of a chance of being able to > reconstruct. The best option is probably for the Promotor to resign so > that Fool can assume it in both gamestates and distribute the proposal.
Alternately, both Promotors can purport to distribute it with the same number at about the same time.
