On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 02:43 +0100, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 3 August 2013 02:32, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement using the mechanism > > in rule 911. > > I support.
(For anyone who hasn't noticed yet: this is useful in the (quite plausible) gamestate where Fool's dictatorship failed, but e correctly became CotC due to damage caused to the gamestate via the ratification bug. We shouldn't be leaving outright lies in the CFJ record.) -- ais523
