On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 06:15 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Charles Walker > <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I suggest the judge file a motion to reconsider (Rule 2318) and assign > > the correct judgement, as any ambiguity here is not a good idea. > > I think two mutually-contradictory actions should be enough to > consider it simply ambiguous in the first place.
I'd assume it clear that only the first one worked. (Also, I second the motions to just reconsider and rejudge it.) -- ais523
