On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, omd wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I vote AGAINST 7608. This repeals R105 early on, which stops > > rule changes from happening, which breaks everything that comes > > after it. > > The only rule stating that permission from R105 is required to make > rule changes is R105 itself.
That's not the problem. Once R105 is gone, what Rule explicitly or implicitly permits Rule Changes, as required by R101(i)?
