On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 15:42 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > I submit the following Proposal, Mostly Simple Judging, AI-2: > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > [This isn't the absolute simplest judgement system, but it's probably > > the simplest that allows for appeals and such. And it is much simpler > > than the current]. > > I might go even further by allowing players to just judge any CFJ any > time they felt like it, and appeals would be handled via piling on > dissenting opinions. There wouldn't be a hard yes/no answer at the end > of it, but Agora's judicial system doesn't actually need one.
I think the *initial* judgement should promote the attempt of a single, somewhat neutral party who can claim to wade through the arguments and pronounce the truth with rhadamanthine majesterial authority. I also like it when that's me. But this gives me an idea for a hybrid system for the appeal. Coming up. -G.
