On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > The intent to ratify the statement in question is enabled by > R2202: > Any player CAN, without objection, ratify a public document, > specifying its scope. > > ... > R2152 reads in part: > 5. CAN: Attempts to perform the described action are successful. > > I clearly attempted to ratify without objection.
Gratuitous: You attempted (to ratify without objection) by announcement, but you did not attempt (to ratify) without objection. (I'm assuming "without objection" is to be considered a method or mechanism similar to "by announcement", since that was the intent.) R2152 does say that attempts are successful, but doesn't specify what constitutes an attempt. Could you also ratify by informing Henri privately, or informing a hat? Perhaps, as in the other CFJ about CAN without a mechanism (which hasn't been judged, right?), we have to infer a definition of "attempt" in terms of historical protocols for performing actions (i.e. generally by telling a forum about it), but I think it's reasonable to follow the intent of the rules and use "without objection" as the missing specification, rather than a part of the action.
