On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:00:05 -0400 omd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Or did that fail for some reason? > > No, I just missed it. Sorry. Corrected results in a bit (spoiler: > I'm no longer PM) >
Sorry, nothing personal. I just felt the offices should be either completely compatible or completely incompatible. The previous rule text seemed to me like an half-hearted attempt to make them incompatible. -- Luis Ressel <[email protected]> GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
