On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2014, at 3:57 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> >
> > I call for judgement on the following statement:
> >
> > "G submitted Proposal: Defining Reasonable Review"
> >
> > Argument: It is unclear whether or not G submitted the Proposal:
> > Defining Reasonable Review because e does not state that e submits the
> > proposal.
>
> I don't think this needs to go to CFJ. People have submitted proposals
> this way in the past, and I don't remember there being any controversy.
> Does anyone think the answer should be FALSE?
A little ironically, in my shaky memory it was me who questioned this
way working ages ago, and some resulting case set the precedent that
it does work.
