On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 22:23 -0400, omd wrote: [...] >> 7700 1 Henri Office Salary > AGAINST; we've attempted this sort of rule quite a lot, and it's never > been worth the recordkeepor issue [...] >> 7702 1 Henri Minister for Social Stratification > AGAINST, not worth the recordkeeping burden [...]
If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise the salary of the recordkeepors in order to compensate for the burden? Isn't that the purpose of the variable office salary? -Henri