On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-10-25 at 22:23 -0400, omd wrote:
[...]
>> 7700 1   Henri       Office Salary
> AGAINST; we've attempted this sort of rule quite a lot, and it's never
> been worth the recordkeepor issue
[...]
>> 7702 1   Henri       Minister for Social Stratification
> AGAINST, not worth the recordkeeping burden
[...]

If it is that difficult for the recordkeepors, couldn't we just raise
the salary of the recordkeepors in order to compensate for the burden?
Isn't that the purpose of the variable office salary?

-Henri

Reply via email to