On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 15:30 -0700, Eritivus wrote: > Sorry, what errors exactly? > The ones where the rules letting non-DMs act were never created.
> My understanding would have been that, as DM, it would be legal for > you to ratify the Warrigal's hypothetical changes. It's ambiguous whether it's possible to do so or not, and thus I haven't done so, to keep the gamestate unambiguous. I'll probably just let Warrigal take the office in the election; if we're lucky, the CFJs will be solved to everyone's satisfaction by then. -- ais523
