On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 01:08:08 +0100 Luis Ressel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, this explanation makes sense. However, it would render scshunt's > claim of my fourth distribution attempt failing wrong (it was no > formal CoE, so it doesn't matter anyway), just like I originally > thought. scshunt, what's your opinion on the matter? My last thoughts on the matter for today: scshunt's claim of my first attempt at distribution succeeding because all "essential" information was in order is wrong because rule 107, which only requires those essential parameters, only applies after some other rule has granted me permission to initiate such an Agoran Decision. For the Promotor, this is rule 1607, and it only grants the Promotor such permission for ADs about proposals currently in the proposal pool. IMO, I failed to formally specify the proposal I was trying to distribute, so R1607 didn't permit me to initate an AD and R107 with its concept of "essential" properties doesn't come in effect at all. -- Luis Ressel <[email protected]> GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
