On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, omd wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Even if the order of changes isn't ambiguous (because it doesn't matter), > > "every instance" may be R105 ambiguous. Is it "every instance" that the > > submitter is aware of? The Rulekeepor? What if there's an instance in > > the "true" ruleset that's not in the current SLR and FLR due to errors? > > Every instance in the true ruleset. I don't think this creates > ambiguity, any more than "amend rule X by replacing 'A' with 'B'" > might have unexpected effects if the Rulekeepor is wrong about the > text of rule X.
I was mainly bringing this in because the CFJ I mentioned (involving Annabel) dealt with uncertainty around "all" and "every", so it might be a good case to look at (I don't remember the judge's arguments, just that e found that "all" was ambiguous). Then I couldn't find the CFJ number, so I don't know if the reasons are good ones...
