On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 09:24 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Opinions sought: how to phrase the following correctly? > > (in a power-3 rule) > Winning is Secured, except as explicitly permitted in > Erratic Rules. > > (does this successfully give power-1 Erratic rules the ability > to define working winning methods while blocking others? > Better phrasing?)
Fall back to the definition of "secured": "It is IMPOSSIBLE to win the game except as allowed by a Rule that is Power 3 and/or Erratic." Another advantage of this is that a whole lot of the definition boils off as irrelevant to winning specifically. -- ais523
