On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 12:54 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote: > or to a switch > that pertains to an Organization or a pair including that > Organization
I probably wrote this bit originally, but this sort of wording has been implicated in at least two very high-profile scams (one in which Contracts could define themselves as players because that was a switch that applied to Contracts, and one in which the rules defining the Province of Agora pertained to it). I think we need to find a different way to quantify the switches we actually care about. > c) A member of an Organization can modify its Charter without > objection, even if such a modification is Inappropriate. Should be "flip", not "modify". Again, my fault. > If an Organization's Income is ever lower than 50, that > Organization Collapses, destroying the Organization. I think we might want some exception for if this happens as a temporary state inside one message? You should be able to redistribute a Budget without worrying about the order in which you make the changes. The normal way would be to pragmatize it (i.e. make Collapsing an Organization an action anyone can do by announcement, rather than automatic), but that's almost inevitably going to lead to scams where people create many empty Organizations in quick succession, before anyone can react. > c) The Herald is authorized to award that player the Patent > Title of Welsher. Probably you shouldn't be able to get a Ribbon this way. -- ais523
