On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> greater than the decisions adoption index and the ration of
decisions; ratio
> the strength of FOR to the strength of AGAINST is equal to
> the decision's adoption index, then the vote collector shall
> select either ADOPTED or REJECTED as the outcome;
When shall e, within 7 days? And CAN e? In any case, this seems to
contradict the earlier statement that the decision has an outcome as
soon as its voting period ends.
> Proposal: Official References (AI=1)
> {{{
> Enact a new power-1 Rule entitled "Official References" reading:
> Where a rule refers to an office in a way such that, by
> necessary implication, it refers to the holder of that office
> (including to authorize or forbid an action), it implicitly refers
> to the player holding that office. Where there are references to
> the past or future, then absent indication to the contrary, the
> rule shall be interpreted as referring to the holder of the office
> at the time in question. If a rule refers to the "current <office>"
> or uses similar language, then it refers to the office's present
> holder, regardless of its holder at the time in question.
I think the last two sentences could be combined.
> Proposal: Centralization (AI=2)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by replacing:
> An imposed office is an office described as such by the rule
> defining it. All others are voluntary. A person CANNOT
> be made the holder of a voluntary office without eir explicit
> or reasonably implied consent. The holder of a voluntary
> office CAN resign it by announcement, causing it to become
> vacant.
replacing what with what?
