On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 19:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, omd wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: > > > Alternatively, you're trying to take the minimum of 4 and an undefined > > > value. I'd have thought the most sensible resolution of this situation > > > is to calculate the result as 4. > > > > I find this more persuasive. Anyone want to call a CFJ? > > Until a CFJ is resolved differently, the Rulekeepor agrees with this > more persuasive line. -G.
Note that it doesn't really persuade me, but in cases of gamestate recalculation, I think it's worth looking at all the plausible arguments (and I agree that that one's at least plausible). In this case, I think I'd prefer a gamestate-merging solution, though (I often think of this as "Murphy-style" because Murphy was so good at them). There's too much at stake otherwise. -- ais523
