On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Did a quick re-write of The Game of Agora category in the Less Logical >> Ruleset style. In terms of precedence, assume footnotes for each >> rule are appended to main text of rule. This re-write should preserve >> function & power, tho changes current Rule# order precedence. >> >> Worth pursuing at all? > > No feedback on the concept even? oh well, maybe not worth doing.
You're not supposed to say that after only 16 hours :) I think emphasizing 'important' rules or clauses over the 'details' is an interesting idea in general. In 2010 (was it really that long ago!?), inspired by someone joining from BlogNomic, I tried more primitively categorizing/sorting the rules by importance[1]; your footnote idea seems like a better way to do that. That said, I think it might be difficult to split things up in a way that still makes sense without reading the footnotes - maybe partially solved by actively adding text to the new main rules briefly summarizing the new footnotes... [1] http://agora.qoid.us/old/alr.txt
