The CFJs are as important as the ruleset. The game has three parts. The rules, their interpretation, and how they're actually used. These are the interpretations. My point is that we really need some sort of record for this. The email archive hardly counts.
-Aris On Sunday, September 18, 2016, Nicholas Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > That seems like a logical short-term solution, though a database would > be nicer. The main problem is that no one wants to take on more > responsibility right now. > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Okay that's a big problem. We need one. In theory it could just be a > report, > > but have we considered putting it on the wiki? > > > > -Aris > > > > > > On Sunday, September 18, 2016, Nicholas Evans <nich...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> There is, unfortunately, no current CFJ archive. The best places to > >> look right now are the older archive, the Full Logical Ruleset, and > >> the general mailing archives. > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Aris Merchant > >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > Okay, I'm a bit confused about this. I think omd's CFJ archive hasn't > >> > been > >> > updated recently? Is there one that has? Sorry if I'm just wrong about > >> > this. > >> > > >> > -Aris >
