CFJs must be statements, not questions. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:27 PM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Employing the power of Rule 991/17, I submit a Call for Judgement for the > following statement: > > "Can this statement have a Judge?" > > I also opt to bar one person from such procedure. That person is the > person who would successfully become the first Judge of the Call for > Judgement submitted by this message. > > ---- > > I pledge to grant one Shiny (if I have at least one and I am capable of > such a transfer) to the Judge of the CFJ summoned via the content above as > long as rules relevant to CFJs haven't changed since I have announced this > pledge and the barring attempt above had barred someone. > > (I dunno, could be fun lol, and I'm very curious about how this might turn > out.) >
