This is a frustrating action - I suggest a rule chsnge allowing a judge to refuse emself with some penalty (ineligible to judge for some period of time)
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 21:17 CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > While I personally 100% agree with Gaelan and I believe that the verdict > of CFJ 3509 should be TRUE (the hugeass text is just context, the crime > itself, if it were, would be the act of "placing the hidden words", not > "placing the hidden words" + "making a hugeass message"), I'm not going to > formally complete the CFJ. I'm going to wait for my period to time out and > get signed off it and incur a card for intentional negligence if needed. > > I can't find a valid reason for the which I shouldn't be able to Judge it > without being dishonest, and this seems the only way out aside from > deregistering. > > The reason for this is that while I consider this CFJ a totally legit > bypass to the finger-pointing system, I don't find myself capable of > actually formally submitting the judgement on such a high-profile conflict > out of simple cowardice, and I'd prefer for a different Judge to do it > instead. > > I pledge to not submit Judgement on CFJ 3509. >
