On Thu, 25 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> I disagree with the citation of CFJ 3469, I explicitly found that they could 
> not be held by non-persons, 
> but if they were awarded to persons then they exist and must be tracked. The 
> rest look fine to me and I like the
> idea of keeping this on the case record. Now that I see what these should 
> look like, I might give you a hand on
> some earlier cases.

Thanks for the feedback, I agree with your correction.  And help definitely 
appreciated; I was hoping 
this batch would show the general format (I'll collect any submitted, might 
wait until I have a 
whole bunch before inputting them to the archive).


Reply via email to