I think that unless people have major problems, we should try it as is with
some more activity and anyone wanting to help, I would be willing to try
and work with you possibly through agencies and for pay.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 03:16 PM, CuddleBeam wrote:
>
> Wrong forum goddamnit lol. Reposting:
>
> We could even sprinkle in some analysis of the game and then the creation
> of a new-comer sort of guide ("Bill Nye"/"Mythbusters"/"other flavor of
> informal" style, to better ease in the complexity? Creation of an
> introductory pamphlet of a sort of the game perhaps?)
>
>
> Informal guides fall under the intended purview of the wiki, which is
> currently part of the WIP github website. Speaking of, I think I'll be
> making a DIS post to describe our current progress and goals in a few hours.
>
> As for tracking and encouraging theses, I'm personally fine with leaving
> it our Herald or separating it, defering to the Herald's judgement.
>
