I am always willing to listen to your criticism G. - please let me know what you thought I said, and how I can word things better in the future to reduce confusion. On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 13:08 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > I humbly and un-regulated-ly withdraw any objection I had to Quazie's > judgement here. In rapidly cutting and pasting lots of judgements > into the database yesterday, I completely misread/misinterpreted the > way e rephrased the CFJ statement. Looking at it for more than 2 minutes > now, it's a fine judgement. > > On Mon, 29 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > > I am happy to reconsider of you lemme know where I over stepped. > > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 21:17 Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am willing to support reconsidering this CFJ on behalf of G. if > there is interest among the players for reconsideration. > > 天火狐 > > > > On 28 May 2017 at 21:18, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > I'm just catching up to this CFJ now, and I have to say I'd > consider > > this an example of judicial overreach and motion to reconsider > were I a > > player. Rather than extrapolating slightly to generalize the > question, > > or slightly changing the wording of the CFJ to answer what the > caller > > *meant* to ask, this uses a judgement to try and sent precedent on > an > > entirely different matter. If this were allowed we'd have to let > judges > > opine on anything, unrelated to their CFJ topic, and consider it > > precedent. > >
