I retract “State of the Union."
I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union v2” by Gaelan, PSS and Aris: <
Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the
Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules. An
Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its Internal
State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report describing that
state. If an organization or agency’s text states that it wishes to use
self-ratifying reports, then portions of the report that describe this state
are self-ratifying.
The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s Head. An
Organization’s Charter must define a member of the organization as the
Responsible Player for each portion of its state; any player can destroy an
organization which does not do so with 1 week Notice.
}
>
Gaelan
> On May 28, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Aris Merchant
> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
>> I create this AI-1.5 proposal “State of the Union” by Gaelan: <
>>
>> Create the power-1.5 rule “Internal State” with this text: {
>>
>> An Agency or Organization’s Internal State is state that is defined by the
>> Agency or Organization’s text (Power or Charter), but not by any rules.
>>
>> An Agency or Organization has a Responsible Player for each part of its
>> Internal State; the Responsible Player SHALL publish a weekly report
>> describing that state. The portion of such a report that describes this
>> state is self-ratifying.
>>
>> The responsible player for all of an Agency’s state is that agency’s Head.
>> An Organization’s Charter must define a Responsible Player for all of its
>> state; any player can destroy an organization which does not do so with 1
>> week Notice.
>>
>> }
>>
>>>
>>
>> This is a half-proto; I’ll retract it if changes are required or pend it if
>> they are not.
>
> Several problems. The worst one that you're imposing obligations on a
> person who need not be a member of the organization. I'd also suggest
> making the self-ratifying bit optional, although I can see arguments
> for and against that.
>
> -Aris
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
