If this is the case, I have no problem supporting such a proposal. 天火狐
On 30 May 2017 at 14:26, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > So grok left, and that's a bummer, but it's especially a bummer for me, > the Superintendent - I think his agency still exists... there's nothing in > the rule about Agencies that suggests it goes away, but I think the agency > is fully neutered, as agencies only allow you to act on behalf of a player. > > Also - this likely means that PSS's agency to allow anyone to re-register > em will never be effective. > > Let's not CFJ unless we need to, but I think we need to modify the Agency > rule to allow the destruction of non-player Agencies at the least (or they > will live `forever`) >
