On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 22:02 +0000, Quazie wrote: >> Wow - The rulesset is a bit of a mess, we should remove instances of >> Class N crimes as they don't mean anything. > > CFJs in the past, after the undefinition of "class N crime", have found > that specifying something as a crime makes it illegal, and higher > classes should encourage higher punishments. In other words, pretty > much what it meant back when it was defined, just less precise.
I agree. I also note that keeping those definitions will make it easier to bring back a criminal judicial system, which we're planing to do soon anyway. -Aris
