I vote as follows: > 7958* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7 Aris 6
AGAINST. I have expressed several concerns about this and Organizations which have not been addressed to my satisfaction. > 7859* Quazie, grok 1.7 Gentle Judicial Updates Quazie 6 I endorse ais529 for resons similar to Aris. > 7860* Quazie 1.7 Cards are power 1.7 Quazie 6 PRESENT. > 7861* Quazie, [2] 3.0 Trivia(l) Quazie 6 PRESENT. > 7862* Quazie, [3] 1.7 Betterer Pledges Quazie 6 FOR. > 7863* Quazie 1.2 Why should outsiders...[4] Quazie 6 PRESENT. 天火狐 On 11 June 2017 at 23:40, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 18:32 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > >> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Fee > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I vote as follows: > >> 7958* Aris, [1] 3.0 Assets v7 Aris 6 > FOR. It's about time. > >> 7859* Quazie, grok 1.7 Gentle Judicial Updates Quazie 6 > Endorse ais523, as it's in eir area of control. > >> 7860* Quazie 1.7 Cards are power 1.7 Quazie 6 > FOR > >> 7861* Quazie, [2] 3.0 Trivia(l) Quazie 6 > AGAINST. I just noticed that this is ambiguous, as it appears to say > that only trivial proposals can be pended by the new mechanism, while > defining trivial proposals in a rather subjective way. > >> 7862* Quazie, [3] 1.7 Betterer Pledges Quazie 6 > FOR, despite reservations about the contract-like provisions. > >> 7863* Quazie 1.2 Why should outsiders...[4] Quazie 6 > PRESENT. I'm going to stay out of this. > > -Aris >
