On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 20:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > This logic (the Secretary's Report can only be published by the > > Secretary) would still break the whole purpose of allowing anyone to > > do it in times when the Secretary is uncertain, I think. > > Well, you could do it via RWO if you know that the Secretary is > uncertain. > > The main purpose here is to cause ratification if everyone is > collectively mistaken as to who the Secretary is. A non-Secretary (who > thinks they're Secretary) posts the report, nobody challenges it (why > would they?), it self-ratifies. However, pointing out that it wasn't by > the Secretary stops the automatic ratification and forces it to be done > manually.
I still disagree that it does, so I guess that's CFJ territory :) (not my main point and not a pressing concern, so I'm not actually calling one...)
