On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 15:44 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
> > wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 00:02 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > > I submit the affixed proposal.
> > > 
> > > Create a new power 3.1 rule entitled "Regulations", with the flowing text:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > A regulation must be authorized by at least one rule in order for
> > > it to exist.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > >   A regulation (or set of regulations) may generally be enacted or 
> > > modified
> > >   without 2 objections, or with Agoran consent. A notice pursuant to the
> > >   previous sentence is known as a "recommendation", and the regulation(s)
> > >   are said to be "recommended" to Agora.
> > 
> > As far as I can tell, this makes it possible to construct a power 3.1
> > object with 1 Agoran Consent (which is somewhat easier than passing an
> > AI 1 proposal). I'm not sure I like the general idea of Regulations
> > anyway (we normally just mandate officers to attempt to pass proposals
> > – give them a free pend if you like). Come to think of it, I'm vaguely
> > curious as to whether there's an intentional scam buried in that
> > proposal; it's long enough and has a dangerous enough subject matter to
> > make that plausible.
> 
> I'll hold it for more comment then, which means it won't pass in time
> for the Birthday Tournament. *sigh* Yes, it would allow you to
> construct a power 3.1 instrument with 1 Agoran Consent, but only if
> doing so was allowed by a power 3.1 rule. However, a power 3.1 rule
> can already do that, so I'm not seeing how this introduces any new
> problems, other than that it might make it easier to convince people
> to do that. You will note that the only rules granted the power to
> make regulations are those concerning Tournaments, and both of those
> rules are Power 1. For the record, this proposal does not contain any
> intentional scams.

Look at my second excerpt. The rule's granting the ability itself; it
provides a mechanism for creating a regulation that doesn't rely on any
other rule. It's probably not intended to, but it is.

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to