It seems to me to be deceptive because it seemed that soon after others observed it, he had known that he had previously received the award. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 20, 2017, at 10:59 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > > On Jun 20, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I find CFJ 3524 FALSE, as the ruleset clearly and undebatebly specifies in >> plain terms that any previous holding of a White Ribbon under any ruleset >> precludes the action that Murphy attempted to take to become the holder of a >> White Ribbon. Further, I point my finger at Murphy for violation of Rule >> 2471. > > Evidence in support of the proposition that Murphy’s actions were intended to > deceive others would be appreciated. > > On its face, I’m inclined to find this finger-pointing to be Shenanigans: the > action was impossible, and there’s every reason Murphy should have known it > was impossible, but I can see no way in which the action or any possible > outcome could be deceptive. I’m happy to entertain competing theories, but > it’s not as obvious to me as it likely is to you that Murphy’s broken that > rule. > > -o >
