This should work equally well. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 6:49 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Well then: > > I invoke judgement on the other statement : I invoke judgement on the other > statement > > > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Jun 28, 2017, at 6:47 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> However, given the multi-lingual nature of Agora, it is ambiguous. >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 5:10 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Now now, the ordering is perfectly clear in two languages, if not in both >>> simultaneously. >>> But when does anyone read anything in two languages simultaneously? >>> >>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >>>> I believe none because the message is ambiguous as to which was the >>>> statement and which was the initiation. >>>> ---- >>>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 4:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How many CFJs is it? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote: >>>>>> A variant on the standard CFJ about if you can CFJ in a particular way. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would've done the whole thing in Arabic vs any of it in English - >>>>>> because in the current form irrelevant seems reasonable. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 16:16 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم >>>>>> بشأن البيان التالي >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
