Calm down! I don’t think he was the questioning the name, but rather if it had a name. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:16 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I reject your CoE. The name of the newspaper is clearly News of Agora. > Failing that, the name of the newspaper is the first heading, CuddleBeam > condemned. This is totally discretionary. Dont question my name, dude. > > On Monday, July 10, 2017, grok (caleb vines) <grokag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 12:43 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > >> For a moment of levity in these trying times: > >> > >> CoE: The Reportor did not give a suitable name for the newspaper eir > >> report. > > > > Gratuitous: the email's subject line contains a pretty reasonable name > > for a newspaper. Can that be considered part of the report? > > > > -- > > ais523 > > Internet messaging standards (RFC 2822) allow up to 998 characters in > a subject line. Gmail and other web clients usually truncate around > 255. Considering that, is allowing report or announcement text in the > subject line a precedent we're okay with? Is there other precedent to > guide us on that subject? (pun DEFINITELY intended) > > > -grok
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
