I would argue that non-players who are greater players are given that right by game custom. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 15:28 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Interestingly, I observed that the arbitor may accept excess cases and > then > > a non-player with the help of the arbitor could have no limit on CFJs as > > the SHALL NOT does not apply to them. > > I shall try to contain the heady rush of power that this gives me. > > On a serious note, a small point worth noting is that while some "rights" > apply to all persons, non-players are explicitly excluded from the right of > participation in the fora (R478). This is a conscious nod to the need for > spam filters, but it also means that the ultimate punishment of forum- > banning is available at need. > > > >
