o, you could probably just use quazie's agency to judge your own CFJ. Unethical but.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:10 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 02:03 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> On Aug 1, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> I spend an action point, if it is possible for me to do so, to >>>>> call >>>>> for judgement on the following statement: >>>>> >>>>> Nichdel has 1 Stamp (nichdel) and 9 Shinies. >>>> >>>> This is CFJ 3550 and was paid for using AP. I assign it to Quazie. >>> >>> If it is possible for me to do so, I withdraw this CFJ. >> >> It only appears to be possible if the CFJ has never had a judge. We >> might want to change that. I can just let the CFJ languish in the >> oblivion of CFJs that nobody cares about if necessary, until the rules >> are changed? > > Crud. Sorry, Quazie. > > As both the caller (myself) and the subject (nichdel) of the CFJ agree on the > outcome, you can _probably_ quote my arguments and call it a day. The results > of the event in question have ratified at this point, anyways, though of > course if you found otherwise then we’d responsibly correct the record with > all due haste. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada
