On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 23:23 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: > On both? From your argument, it sounds like the proposal text > contains the comment (second CFJ true) but it is stripped when > adopting. > > That’s a good enough answer for me. I retract those CFJs.
I believe the proposal actually contains the text, but if it doesn't unambiguously specify a ruleset gamestate change (and such text normally doesn't), it does nothing when adopted. A situation in which it could be different would be if the bracketed text was unambiguously part of a quote of a new wording of a rule. Also, I somehow managed to entirely miss assigning these CFJs again, didn't I? -- ais523
