Oh, sorry: as is obvious from my attempt to re-start it, I thought you were 
talking
about the Quill election.

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> The argument that it failed was a combination of the ability to add to the 
> pool of options mid-decision and the confusion regarding the definition of 
> announcement as a candidate.
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:20 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
>       That's another CFJ then - from what I can tell from searching you never 
> said
>       it didn't work, and I'm not sure I see anything wrong with the 
> announcement -
>       can you point me to any arguments that it failed?
> 
>       On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>       > I don't believe that it had ever correctly started.
>       > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 16:06 Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>       >       I vote for G in the Herald election if it is still ongoing.
>       > I request that the Herald finally tally the results of the Victory 
> Election held many moons ago.
>       >
>       >
>       > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:03 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> 
> wrote:
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >       On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>       >       > I hereby initiate an Agoran Decision for the Silver Quill 
> 2016. The vote
>       >       > collector is the Herald and the options are any proposals 
> adopted between
>       >       > November 1, 2015 and October 31, 2016 (inclusive).
>       >
>       >       I deputize for the Herald to resolve the Silver Quill 2016 
> Agoran Decision.
>       >
>       >       Votes: 0 valid
>       >       Results: FAILED QUORUM
>       >
>       >       [Quazie submitted a vote that was beyond a reasonable effort to 
> determine].
>       >
>       >       CAMPAIGN SPEECH:
>       >
>       >       While the current Officeholder has done an admirable job 
> attempted to fill many
>       >       offices, e has not had the time nor attention to devote to the 
> Herald:
>       >
>       >       1.  E left this decision unresolved, made no attempt to raise 
> quorum or interest
>       >           in the vote.
>       >
>       >       2.  He showed limited effort in resolving patent titles (e.g. 
> recent Champion).
>       >
>       >       3.  Limited/delayed response for the recent Tournament 
> resolution (regardless
>       >           of whether the tournament was destroyed, e was late in 
> weighing in).
>       >
>       >       With the greatest of respect to my Honorable opponent, I 
> believe I am the
>       >       candidate to pay attention to the job.
>       >
>       >       [Note:  was thinking of saving the Quill Deputization for after 
> the election,
>       >       but I think a rousing campaign with no such after-tricks is 
> more fun/refreshing].
>       >
>       >       -Candidate G.
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to