Thank you. K
On Sep 7, 2017 10:04 PM, "VJ Rada" <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > The creation of stamps is done by this text: "Once per month, a player > MAY, by announcement, transfer to Agora the Stamp Value, in shinies, > to create a Stamp.". MAY means something is legal and not punishable, > but it doesn't imply CAN, which creates a mechanism to do it. > Therefore, all previous such transfers were legal, but did not > actually happen. We plan to fix the problem by waving our hands and > pretending that all previous transfers did happen, although that will > not apply to future transfers until o's most recent proposal passes, > fixing the rule. > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Kyle Anderson <kyescott5...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I hate to be annoying, but will someone explain to me what just happened > > with stamps? I've read through the posts, but I'm confused at why they no > > longer exist. I thought that the scam did not succeed, though I'm not > > entirely sure why. Did the scam work? > > > > Sorry, just trying to wrap my head around this. There's a lot to follow > > tonight. > > > > K > > > > On Sep 7, 2017 9:32 PM, "Aris Merchant" <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ > gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > FTR, for obvious reasons ratification is secured at power 3, so it > > takes an AI 3 proposal to ratify something, > > > > -Aris > > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> It is, as far as I can tell, always possible to unilaterally prevent > >> ratification without objection, and to prevent self-ratification, if you > >> have the will to do so. Ratification by proposal is harder to stop > >> single-handedly, but you can always outline your objections in plain > >> language and hope people vote against the proposal. > >> > >> -o > >> > >> On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:24 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I dont like the taste of it at all but oh well. > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Aris Merchant > >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> You couldn't be carded. Speaking for myself though, I would > >>> disapprove. Ratification seems like the best way out of this mess. > >>> > >>> -Aris > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > Proto-actions: > >>> > > >>> > I object to the latest Stamps Addendum and the latest weekly > >>> > Secretary’s > >>> > report on grounds that their author has included information which is > >>> > inaccurate. > >>> > > >>> > I Point a Finger to myself for harming gameplay interests via the > >>> > objection > >>> > above. > >>> > > >>> > ---- > >>> > > >>> > Would I be carded? Is disagreeing to including false information like > >>> > this > >>> > (for the greater good of the flow of gameplay) "bad"? > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:13 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Sure but it can also be used to fix things everyone agrees is wrong. > >>> >> If you want to object to o.'s reports I guess, do so. We'll figure > it > >>> >> out some way. > >>> >> > >>> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > Really? I thought it was to "anchor" the gamestate in case of > >>> >> > dispute > >>> >> > or > >>> >> > ambiguity so that the game can continue, but here there really > isnt > >>> >> > one. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:09 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> i mean, that's why ratification exists. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Cuddle Beam < > cuddleb...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> > Knowingly including inaccurate information doesn't feel right > to > >>> >> >> > me. > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Owen Jacobson < > o...@grimoire.ca> > >>> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 10:47 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > > >>> >> >> >> > Let's just ratify everyone who we thought had stamps into > >>> >> >> >> > having > >>> >> >> >> > them. > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> Not objecting to my last Stamps Addendum or my last weekly > >>> >> >> >> Secretary’s > >>> >> >> >> report will do that, thankfully. > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> -o > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> From V.J Rada > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> From V.J Rada > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > From V.J Rada >
