Too much chance of there being a recent error we haven't caught yet. A year is rather paranoid, and six months would probably work fine. Then again, it doesn't hurt to be paranoid about things like this.
-Aris On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 12:13 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why aren't we ratifying the current one? > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I submit the following proposal, and will pend it tomorrow right >> before I distribute. For the reference all the new players, we used to >> ratify the SLR every once in a while to make sure it doesn't get too >> far from the way we understood it to be (or so I'm told, I wasn't here >> yet then). Terrifyingly, we haven't done so since 1 May 2014, as >> reported by the FLR. This is serious problem, as it means there has >> been significant time for our perception of the rules to drift from >> the platonic reality. I therefore propose that we ratify the SLR >> published by G. almost exactly a year ago (we only ratify the SLR, so >> that we don't ratify the rule histories, only their states). >> >> -Aris >> --- >> Title: SLR Ratification >> Adoption index: 3.0 >> Author: Aris >> Co-authors: >> >> Ratify the Short Logical Ruleset published on the 9th of September 2016, >> available here [1]. >> >> [1] >> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2016-September/011230.html > > > > -- > From V.J Rada
