It occurs to me that (thinking back over a couple years), several registration errors have been ratified, and given that this kicks people out of the game, it's a fairly big error that can lead to anger. Also changes in registration are infrequent enough that a weekly reset isn't needed, it's not too hard to go back a little further and reconstruct. So I'm thinking that weekly ratification is too much for playerhood, maybe monthly...?
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > No one made any campaign or supporting/opposing speeches during the election, > at least not that I saw? This is key to any election that's actually > contested. Reading your vote, it seemed like a general preference against > incumbency, but not as if you had any direct reason to protest against PSS. > > The closest challenger didn't vote for emself first so probably wasn't too > keen on the position, and as PSS's reports have generally been timely I'd > prefer someone who proves themselves willing. The various CoEs that go by > on all the reports blur together and I don't notice a pattern unless I'm > involved with the CoE. > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:45 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ====Registrar==== > > > This result has changed. Nichdel had three first-preference votes, but > > > PSS had six and remains registrar. This resolver disagrees with the > > > result. Anyway. > > > > > > Either people forgot that PSS attempted to deregister me by > > ratification four weeks in a row or it wasn't important enough for > > anyone to care. But in either case, I'm pretty unhappy with the result > > of the registrar election and with the players who voted PSS back into > > the position. > > > > > > -grok
