>One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the >>> Tailor. If an election for it comes up, I'll definitely vote for >>> myself.
G. actually won that election like two days ago :( On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:05 AM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On second thought, I don't think I really want the responsibilities of an > office yet. I think I'll stay unemployed for now. > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks, everyone, for your answers. >> >> I'm not too interested in the Superintendent office, so I don't think I'll >> go for that. >> I could go for the Referee, since o said e wouldn't mind me taking it, but >> I'm not really sure I want it either. >> >> One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the >> Tailor. If an election for it comes up, I'll definitely vote for myself. (Or >> could I deputize for it? I still don't fully understand the deputisation >> thing) >> >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > * Voting to enter a CFJ into moot if there’s a serious doubt about the >>> > judgement (r. 911, rare), >>> >>> This has happened for the first time relatively recently and it has come >>> up a few times since. >>> >>> > * Voting to win the game (r. 2482, rare), >>> >>> Something is supposed to be happening in regards to this >>> >>> > * Voting for a proposal author to win the Silver Quill for the year (r. >>> > 2444, rare). >>> >>> And this... >>> >>> ---- >>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
